New Zealand
Occasionally in life, there are times when one wants to say, “I can’t believe I’m getting paid to do this.” I enjoy my work, I often love my work, but seldom would I say that doing it felt like a vacation. My three weeks in New Zealand in 2008 induced that feeling, however—which is not to say that I did no work while there. In that period, I delivered seven lectures and seminars, sometimes feverishly revising PowerPoint files between appearances, traveled in and out of five national airports, and prepared a white paper for my hosts, the Centre for Advanced Engineering in New Zealand (CAENZ), at the University of Canterbury in Christchurch.
It’s just that New Zealand is such an intriguing, beautiful place to be, and the people are remarkably civilized and pleasant. In the photos and comments that follow, I hope that I convey those positive impressions while recognizing that New Zealand, like any other nation on Earth, has its flaws and tends to be aware of them. Most of all, I am grateful to the people at CAENZ for making the opportunity available, and I hope that I was as useful to them as they hoped when they invited me as an expert on land-use planning for hazards to advise on national policy. Like the model Peace Corps worker, my goal was to learn every bit as much from them as they could from me while being as generous as possible in sharing my own knowledge.
The invitation to come to New Zealand arrived, via Kristin Hoskin on behalf of CAENZ, in the winter of 2008 and eventually jelled into a trip from July 25-August 15. I gave up a Chicago summer for a New Zealand winter. One of the consistent questions that emerged among American friends was why New Zealand was so interested in spending money to attract an American expert on planning for natural hazards.
My simple answer was a question: “Have you seen Lord of the Rings?” If the answer was yes, I replied, “The movie was filmed entirely in New Zealand. Think about the landscape.”
Put another way, New Zealand fits into what I often call our “fatal attraction” as a species to occasionally dangerous landscapes that, at the same time, are often the most appealing locations because they afford views of the coast or the river or from mountaintops, or are nestled in the forest. Thus we find ourselves facing dangers from tropical storms, landslides, earthquakes, volcanoes, floods, and wildfires. The issue is not unique to any one nation or region. It is a worldwide human behavioral phenomenon.
As if to reinforce what I was saying, the winter weather upon my arrival the last week in July turned increasingly sullen, wet, and miserable, though some days were quite pleasant. But storms were moving into the North Island from the ocean and making clear, in some cases, that New Zealand was a nation of noteworthy natural hazards. This was of only minor consequence the first few days. After my arrival on a Sunday morning, we spent several days in Wellington attending the Australasian Natural Hazards Management Conference at Te Papa, the national museum of New Zealand. I spoke there about lessons learned from the 1993 Midwest floods, an assignment I had expected before realizing that history would be repeated to some degree in the devastating 2008 floods that struck Iowa and some neighboring states. I added shots I had taken in late June in Cedar Rapids and Iowa City to my presentation. Clearly, recent events had made my presentation at the conference considerably more timely.
As the weekend approached, however, the issue of the storms loomed larger. CAENZ personnel had arranged for a helicopter tour over Mount Ruapehu, an active volcano on the North Island, on Saturday, but it had to be scrubbed. A laconic veteran pilot who was to take us, when asked that morning about the weather, said only, “Doesn’t look good.” The interpretation, I was told, was that he had no intention of risking anyone’s life for the journey as a result of terrible flying conditions resulting from the ocean-borne storms. That did not stop us from ascending part of the mountain by car, but the ski lodge where we finally stopped was closed, the snow was coming down, and the roads were getting worse. Things were not so bad down in the valley at the lodge that housed us, but the higher altitudes were problematic. The water in the creek behind the lodge was running fast, and the winds had knocked out some power and damaged numerous trees. So we had to settle for staying on the ground.
Despite the obvious disappointments connected with the scrubbed helicopter flight, the storms that swept the North Island were in reality but a minor display of the potential disasters awaiting New Zealand if nature were to unleash its full fury.
One major concern that links New Zealand with California, to which it bears some similarity in size and in its long north-south orientation, is its seismicity. New Zealand, of course, has a far smaller population and is an island nation, but earthquake faults run the length of the land, crossing from the waters west of the South Island to those east of the North Island, and traversing Wellington, the capital, which lies at the southern end of the North Island on a peninsula buffeted by strong winds across a narrow strait. (The airport, as a result, does not exactly afford an airline pilot’s dream landing.) One presentation at the conference in Wellington concerned a December 21, 2007, earthquake in Gisborne, a small city on the eastern shore of the North Island, the result of offshore tremors. New Zealand engineers have been spurred by circumstance to invent effective new systems for protecting major buildings. Base isolation systems that separate buildings from earthquake shocks lie beneath both Te Papa and the New Zealand Parliament, the long building behind another government building affectionately known as the Beehive because of its design.
The significance of landscape-related hazards is so great that it is reflected in an institution that is in some respects an equivalent of the U.S. National Flood Insurance Program. New Zealand’s Earthquake Commission (EQC), using a surcharge on property insurance, insures against geologic hazards including both landslides and earthquakes. In the U.S., curiously, landslides are one disaster that remains completely uninsured, largely because the risk pool would be so self-selective as to guarantee losses for any insurer who ventured into that market. On the other hand, the U.S. ventured into effectively nationalizing flood insurance for much the same reason, but the losses nationwide were far greater. The Earthquake Commission serves additional purposes, such as public education and research on seismic hazards.
The issue of landslides particularly interested me. Although landslides do occur naturally, in modern society they are more often the product of unwise development practices. We disrupt the delicate balance between friction and gravity that holds hillsides in place by building roads and homes and farming. There are technical solutions to the problems we create, but there are also times when we might best say that developing a particular area involves too much risk and that retaining it in open space may be the wiser option.
In the New Zealand case, the issue is quite stark. It is estimated that as much as 95% of the landscape was “bush” prior to human settlement. This term basically refers to a dense temperate rainforest. Some of that bush was thinned following the arrival of the Maori, Polynesian settlers, in the 1200s. The process was intensified with European settlement beginning in the 19th century. Much of the land was converted to grasslands for sheep farming. Sheep outnumber humans about ten to one in New Zealand, a land that was home to few mammals (such as seals and sea lions) larger than rodents before humans arrived. The Maori brought pigs; the British brought sheep, who now number nearly 40 million. One result, however, has been steady erosion of hillside farmlands, which must be remedied over time by reforestation, where possible, and improved farming practices, to stabilize the soil. Without such remedies, eroded soil clogs rivers, which increase flooding in downstream communities.
New Zealand is much more than its sheep and farmers, of course. Its cities are vibrant, interesting places; its wild places rival the best the world has to offer. Wellington, a capital built on hillsides facing a narrow strait between the North and South Islands, offers a cable car to the top of a hill that sports the entrance to an excellent botanical garden. It is a city with some attractive old churches that charm their surroundings, but it is also the seat of national government.
Queenstown was a very different place, much more resembling a ski town in Colorado than the predominantly coastal larger cities of New Zealand. It sits in the Southern Alps of the South Island, and its stunning scenery along mountain-rimmed Lake Wakatipu already has raised the cost of local real estate for nearly half a century and attracts vacation home residents like Shania Twain. These mountains also house and attract the adventurous of New Zealand with opportunities such as bungee jumping into deep river gorges.
It was not tourists or developers who were first drawn to these mountains, but in many cases miners seeking their fortunes amid daunting hardships. New Zealand had its own gold rush soon after California’s, and miners poured in from numerous places, including China, populating mining camps and small mountain villages. However, the remnants of those settlements often are tourist attractions now, reminding us all just how hard life was in these hills just a few generations ago.
In New Zealand, cities and nature can live side by side, though as in any other country, strong public support of conservation efforts are required to ensure success. One excellent example is the nature preserve on the Otago Peninsula in Dunedin, on the southern end of the eastern shore of the South Island. Dunedin took its name from its predominantly Scottish settlers, but is now one of New Zealand’s largest cities and home to Otago University. The nature preserve allows limited numbers of visitors on guided walking tours that are well worth the price to see wildlife including sea lions, seals, albatross, and penguins.
This, to me, represents a high representation of civilized achievement: the ability to live peacefully together in cities while also finding ways to live peacefully with the other species that inhabit the planet with us. No place is perfect in this respect, but in the Otago Peninsula, New Zealand seems to have come a long, long way toward the ideal.
And besides, the penguins really are cute, even if the sea lions are more inclined to view them as lunch. That, too, is part of nature and is generally in balance when we learn to leave it alone—and enjoy it for what it is.
Jim Schwab